Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Table of Contents

1389 Moffett Park Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94089

October 18, 201122, 2012

Dear Stockholder:

        You are cordially invited to attend this year's annual meeting of stockholders of Finisar Corporation on Monday, November 28, 2011,December 3, 2012, at 10:11:00 a.m. local time. The meeting will be held at the offices of DLA Piper LLP (US), located at 2000 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, California 94303.

        We are pleased to again take advantage of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials primarily over the Internet. We have used this delivery process the last yeartwo years and found that it expedited stockholders' receipt of proxy materials and lowered the costs and reduced the environmental impact of distributing proxy materials for our annual meeting. On October 18, 2011,22, 2012, we mailed to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011,2012, over the Internet. The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. If you receive your annual meeting materials by mail, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy card will be enclosed.

        The matters to be acted upon are described in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Following the formal business of the meeting, we will report on our company's operations and respond to questions from stockholders.

        Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, your vote is very important and we encourage you to vote promptly. You may vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you attend the meeting you will, of course, have the right to revoke the proxy and vote your shares in person. If you hold your shares through an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee to vote your shares.

        We look forward to seeing you at the annual meeting.

		Very truly yours,
		JERRY S. RAWLS Chairman of the Board
		EITAN GERTEL Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2011
DECEMBER 3, 2012

        The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Finisar Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held on Monday, November 28, 2011,December 3, 2012, at 10:11:00 a.m. local time, at the offices of DLA Piper LLP (US), 2000 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, California 94303, for the following purposes:

1.

To elect two Class IIII directors to hold office for a three-year term and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.



2.

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2012.2013.



3.

To hold anvote on a non-binding advisory vote onresolution to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (as defined in the proxy statement).



4.

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory stockholder votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.



5.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

        Stockholders of record at the close of business on October 4, 201110, 2012 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. For ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose relating to the meeting, during ordinary business hours at our principal offices located at 1389 Moffett Park Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94089. This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, are available at http://investor.finisar.com/annual-proxy.cfm.

        Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy as promptly as possible in order to assure the presence of a quorum. You may vote by telephone, Internet or mail. If you vote by telephone or Internet, you do not have to mail in your proxy card. Voting in advance will not prevent you from voting in person at the meeting.

		CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN Secretary

Sunnyvale, California
October 18, 201122, 2012

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

1389 Moffett Park Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94089

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        The board of directors of Finisar Corporation is soliciting your proxy for the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Monday, November 28, 2011,December 3, 2012, at 10:11:00 a.m. local time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This proxy statement and related materials are first being made available to stockholders of the Company on or about October 18, 2011.22, 2012. References in this proxy statement to the "Company," "we," "our," "us" and "Finisar" are to Finisar Corporation, and references to the "annual meeting" are to the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. When we refer to the Company's fiscal year, we mean the annual period ending on April 30. This proxy statement covers our 20112012 fiscal year, which was from May 1, 20102011 through April 30, 20112012 ("fiscal 2011"2012").

SOLICITATION AND VOTING

        Record Date.    Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on October 4, 201110, 2012 as the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment thereof. As of the record date, 90,793,52592,846,263 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote.

        Internet Availability of Annual Meeting Materials.    We are pleased to again take advantage of the rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") allowing companies to furnish proxy materials over the Internet to their stockholders rather than mailing paper copies of those materials to each stockholder. On October 18, 2011,22, 2012, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials directing stockholders to a web sitewebsite where they can access our proxy statement for the annual meeting and our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended April 30, 20112012 and view instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by phone. If you would prefer to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

        Quorum.    A majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the record date must be represented at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Your shares will be counted toward the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker or bank) or if you vote in person at the meeting. Abstentions and "broker non-votes" (shares held by a broker or nominee that does not have the authority, either express or discretionary, to vote on a particular matter) will each be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

        Vote Required to Adopt Proposals.    Each share of our common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each of the two director nominees and one vote on each other matter. For the election of directors, the two director nominees receiving the highest number of "FOR""FOR" votes will be elected as Class IIII directors. With respect to each of the other proposals, approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote either in person or by proxy.vote.

        Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes.    Shares not present at the meeting and shares voted "Abstain""Withhold" will have no effect on the election of directors. With respect to Proposal No. 4, the advisory vote on the frequency of holding future advisory votes on executive compensation, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against all of the time periods presented. For each of the other proposals, shares not present at the meeting will have no effect on the vote and abstentions will have the same effect as negative votes. If you are a beneficial owner and

Table of Contents

hold your shares in "street name," it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors and the executive compensation proposals.

Table of Contents

advisory proposal. Under the rules governing banks and brokers who are votingsubmit a proxy card with respect to shares held in street name, such banks and brokers have the discretion to vote on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. Routine matters include the ratification of auditors. Non-routine matters include the election of directors and the executive compensation advisory proposals.proposal. Banks and brokers may not vote on these proposals if you do not provide specific voting instructions. Accordingly, we encourage you to vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. Proxies and ballots will be received and tabulated by the inspector of election for the annual meeting.

        Voting Instructions.    If you complete and submit your proxy card or voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will follow your instructions. If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy card or voting instructions but do not direct how to vote on each item, the persons named as proxies will vote "FOR" the election of management's nominees for director, "FOR" ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the board recommends on each proposal.fiscal year ending April 30, 2013 and "FOR" the non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

        Depending on how you hold your shares, you may vote in one of the following ways:

Stockholders of Record:Record:    You may vote by proxy or over the Internet or by telephone. Please follow the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, on the proxy card you received, then sign and return it in the prepaid envelope. You may also vote in person at the annual meeting.

Beneficial Stockholders:Stockholders:    Your bank, broker or other holder of record will provide you with a voting instruction card for you to use to instruct them on how to vote your shares. Check the instructions provided by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which options are available to you. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the annual meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your bank, broker or other agent.

        Votes submitted by telephone or via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on November 25, 2011.30, 2012. Submitting your proxy by telephone or via the Internet will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the annual meeting.

        If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close by returning a later-dated proxy card, by voting again by Internet or telephone as more fully detailed in your Notice or proxy card, or by delivering written instructions to the Corporate Secretary before the annual meeting. Attendance at the annual meeting will not in and of itself cause your previously voted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request or vote again at the annual meeting. If your shares are held by a bank, broker or other agent, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your bank, broker or other agent, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other agent giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

        Solicitation of Proxies.    We will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting stockholders by mail, we will request banks, brokers and other intermediaries holding shares of our common stock beneficially owned by others to obtainsolicit proxies from the beneficial owners and will reimburse them for their reasonable, expenses in so doing. Solicitationout-of-pocket costs. We may use the services of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, by electronic communications and personal solicitation by our directors, officers and employees. Noother employees to solicit proxies, personally or by telephone, without additional compensation will be paid to our directors, officers or employees for such solicitation.compensation.

        Voting Results.    We will announce preliminary voting results at the annual meeting. We will report final results in a Form 8-K report filed with the SEC.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that the authorized number of members of the board of directors shall be fixed from time to time by the board of directors and that the terms of office of the members of the board of directors will be divided into three classes. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors from one of the three classes are elected for a term of three years to succeed those directors whose terms expire at the annual meeting. The authorized number of directors is currently set at seven,six, consisting of twothree classes of two members each and one class of three members.each.

        The termsterm of the Class IIII directors will expire on the date of the upcoming annual meeting. The current Class III members of the board of directors are Eitan Gertel and Dominique Trempont. Mr. Trempont has advised the Nominating and Governance Committee and the board that he will be retiring from service on the board as of the date of the annual meeting and will not stand for re-election at the annual meeting. The Nominating and Governance Committee is conducting a search to identify candidates for one or more additional positions on the board, but it has not identified a candidate to nominate for election at the annual meeting to fill Mr. Trempont's seat. Accordingly, the board has determined to reduce the size of the board from seven to six members, effective immediately upon the election of Class III directors at the annual meeting. In connection with the reduction in the size of the board, the board has also determined to reconfigure the composition of the classes of the board in order to make the size of the three classes equal. In order to accomplish the reconfiguration of the board, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended to the board that Thomas E. Pardun, currently a Class I director whose term expires at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders, stand for re-election as a Class III director at the annual meeting. Mr. Pardun has tendered his resignation as a Class I director to be effective immediately upon the election of Class III directors at the annual meeting.

Accordingly, two persons are to be elected to serve as Class IIII directors at the meeting. Management's nominees for election by the stockholders to those two positions are Mr. PardunMichael C. Child and Mr. Gertel, whoRoger C. Ferguson, each of whom currently serves as a Class IIII member of the board. If elected, each nominee will serve as a director until our annual meeting of stockholders in 20142015 and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. If anyeither of the nominees declines to serve or becomes unavailable for any reason, or if a vacancy occurs before the election (although we know of no reason to anticipate that this will occur), the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominees, if any, as we may designate. The proxies cannot vote for more than two persons. If a quorum is present and voting, the two nominees for Class IIII director receiving the highest number of votes will be elected as Class IIII directors.

        The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" the nominees named above.

        The following table sets forth information regarding our current directors, including the nominees for Class IIII directors to be elected at the annual meeting, as of August 15, 2011.September 30, 2012.

Table of Contents

Nominees for Election for a Three Year Term Expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Eitan Gertel has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a director since the completion of the Optium Corporation merger in August 2008. Mr. Gertel served as Optium's President and as a director from March 2001 and as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Optium from February 2004 through the completion of the merger. Mr. Gertel served as President and General Manager of the former transmission systems division of JDS Uniphase Corporation from 1995 to 2001. JDSU is a provider of broadband test and management solutions and optical products. Mr. Gertel holds a B.S.E.E. from Drexel University. As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gertel brings to the board significant senior leadership, industry and technical experience. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gertel is in a position to provide the board with insight and information related to the Company's business and operations and to participate in the ongoing review of strategic issues.

Thomas E. Pardun has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2009. Mr. Pardun is currently the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Western Digital Corporation, a manufacturer of hard-disk drives for the personal computer and home entertainment markets. Mr. Pardun has served in this capacity from January 2000 to January 2002 and again since April 2007. Mr. Pardun was President of MediaOne International, Asia-Pacific (previously U.S. West International, Asia-Pacific, a subsidiary of U.S. West, Inc.), an owner/operator of international properties in cable television, telephone services and wireless communications companies, from May 1996 until his retirement in July 2000. Prior to 1996, Mr. Pardun served as President and CEO of U.S. West Multimedia Communications, a communications company. Before joining U.S. West, Mr. Pardun was President of the Central Group for Sprint, as well as President of Sprint's West Division, and Senior Vice President of Business Development for United Telecom, a predecessor company to Sprint. Mr. Pardun also held a variety of management positions during a 19-year tenure with IBM, concluding as Director of product-line evaluation. He is also a director of CalAmp Corporation, Calix Corporation and MaxLinear, Inc., and served as a director of Occam Networks, Inc. from September 2004 until February 2011 when it was acquired by Calix Corporation. Mr. Pardun holds a B.B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Iowa. Mr. Pardun brings to the board extensive management and operations experience in the computer and telecommunications industries, including marketing and product development expertise, as well as his service in senior management positions.

Directors Continuing in Office until the 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

        Michael C. Child has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2010 and previously served on our board from November 1998 until October 2005. Mr. Child has been employed by TA Associates, Inc., a private equity firm, since 1982 where he currently serves as a Senior Advisor. Mr. Child served as a Managing Director of TA Associates from 1987 through 2010. Mr. Child also currently serves on the board of directors of IPG Photonics, which designs and manufactures high performance fiber lasers and amplifiers, and Ultratech, Inc., which designs and manufactures photolithography and thermal processing equipment, and served on the board of directors of Eagle Test Systems, a manufacturer of high performance automated test equipment for the semiconductor industry, from 2003 until November 2008 when it was acquired by Teradyne, Inc. Mr. Child holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California at Davis and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. Child has more than 25 years' experience investing in and acquiring technology and technology-related companies and has served on the boards of directors of numerous public and private companies, including companies in the fiber optics and semiconductor industries. This broad financial and industry experience enables Mr. Child to make a valuable contribution to the board. He also brings significant knowledge regarding the Company and its operations from his previous years of service on our board.

Table of Contents

        Roger C. Ferguson has served as a member of our board of directors since August 1999. From June 1999 to December 2001, Mr. Ferguson served as Chief Executive Officer of Semio Corp., an early stage software company. Mr. Ferguson served as a principal in VenCraft, LLC, a venture capital partnership,

Table of Contents

from July 1997 to August 2002. From August 1993 to July 1997, Mr. Ferguson was Chief Executive Officer of DataTools, Inc., a database software company. From 1987 to 1993, Mr. Ferguson served as Chief Operating Officer of Network General Inc., a network analysis company. Mr. Ferguson holds a B.A. in Psychology from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth. Mr. Ferguson brings senior leadership experience and strategic and financial expertise to the board from his prior work as a senior executive of a public company and several private companies and as chief financial officer of a public company. Mr. Ferguson has extensive experience in both the hardware and software segments of the computer and telecommunications industries.

Directors Continuing in Office until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

        Jerry S. Rawls has served as a member of our board of directors since March 1989 and as our Chairman of the Board since January 2006. Mr. Rawls served as our Chief Executive Officer from August 1999 until the completion of the Optium Corporation merger in August 2008. Mr. Rawls also served as our President from April 2003 until the completion of the Optium merger and previously held that title from April 1989 to September 2002. From September 1968 to February 1989, Mr. Rawls was employed by Raychem Corporation, a materials science and engineering company, where he held various management positions including Division General Manager of the Aerospace Products Division and Interconnection Systems Division. Mr. Rawls holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech University and an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Purdue University. Mr. Rawls' tenure with Finisar since 1989, including 19 years as President and/or Chief Executive Officer, provides him personal knowledge of the Company's history since shortly after its founding. This experience, together with his management and industry experience, enables him to provide the board with a unique perspective on the Company's business and operations and strategic issues.

        Robert N. Stephens has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2005 and as our Lead Director since March 2010. Mr. Stephens served as the Chief Executive Officer since April 1999 and President since October 1998 of Adaptec, Inc., a storage solutions provider, until his retirement in May 2005. Mr. Stephens joined Adaptec in November 1995 as Chief Operating Officer. Before joining Adaptec, Mr. Stephens was the founder and chief executive officer of Power I/O, a company that developed serial interface solutions and silicon expertise for high-speed data networking, that was acquired by Adaptec in 1995. Prior to founding Power I/O, Mr. Stephens was President and CEO of Emulex Corporation, which designs, develops and supplies Fibre Channel host bus adapters. Before joining Emulex, Mr. Stephens was Senior Vice President, General Manager, and founder of the Microcomputer Products Group at Western Digital Corporation. He began his career at IBM, where he served over 15 years in a variety of human resource management positions. Mr. Stephens holds a B.A. in Philosophy and Psychology and an M.S. in Industrial Psychology from San Jose State University. Mr. Stephens brings to the board executive and industry experience in a number of strategic and operational areas through his service as Chief Executive Officer of Adaptec, Power I/O and Emulex and in executive roles at Western Digital.

Retiring DirectorDirectors Continuing in Office until the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

        Dominique TrempontEitan Gertel has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a director since the completion of the Optium merger in August 2008. Mr. Gertel served as Optium's President and as a director from March 2001 and as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Optium from February 2004 through the completion of the merger. Mr. Gertel served as President and General Manager of the former transmission systems division of JDS Uniphase Corporation from 1995 to 2001. JDSU is a provider of broadband test and management solutions and optical products. Mr. Gertel holds a

Table of Contents

B.S.E.E. from Drexel University. As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gertel brings to the board significant senior leadership, industry and technical experience. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gertel is in a position to provide the board with insight and information related to the Company's business and operations and to participate in the ongoing review of strategic issues.

Thomas E. Pardun has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2005.December 2009. Mr. TrempontPardun is currently the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Western Digital Corporation, a manufacturer of hard-disk drives for the personal computer and home entertainment markets. Mr. Pardun has served in this capacity from January 2000 until November 2001 and again since April 2007. Mr. Pardun was President of MediaOne International, Asia-Pacific (previously U.S. West International, Asia-Pacific, a subsidiary of U.S. West, Inc.), an owner/operator of international properties in cable television, telephone services and wireless communications companies, from May 1996 until his retirement in July 2000. Prior to 1996, Mr. Pardun served as President and CEO of U.S. West Multimedia Communications, a communications company. Before joining U.S. West, Mr. Pardun was President of the Central Group for Sprint, as well as President of Sprint's West Division, and Senior Vice President of Business Development for United Telecom, a predecessor company to Sprint. Mr. Pardun also held a variety of management positions during a 19-year tenure with IBM, concluding as Director of product-line evaluation. He is also a memberdirector of the board of directors of Energy Recovery,CalAmp Corporation, Calix, Inc. and MaxLinear, Inc., a manufacturer of efficient energy recovery devices utilized in the water desalination industry, RealNetworks, Inc., which provides products and services to enable consumers to save, store and access digital media on many different devices, the Daily Mail and General Trust, plc, a producer of content, information analytics and events for business and consumers, and on24, Inc., a leader in webcast and virtual events. Mr. Trempont served as a director of 3Com CorporationOccam Networks, Inc. from 2006September 2004 until April 2010February 2011 when it was acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company.Calix, Inc. Mr. Trempont was CEO in residence at Battery Ventures from August 2003 until June 2004. Prior to joining Battery Ventures, Mr. Trempont was Chairman, President

Table of Contents

and Chief Executive Officer of Kanisa, Inc.,Pardun holds a software company focused on enterprise self-service applications, from November 1999 to November 2002. Mr. Trempont was President and Chief Executive Officer of Gemplus Corporation, a smart card company, from May 1997 to June 1999. Prior to his employment at Gemplus, Mr. Trempont served as Chief Financial Officer and head of Operations at NeXT Software. Mr. Trempont began his career at Raychem Corporation. Mr. Trempont received an undergraduate degree in Economics from College Saint Louis (Belgium), a B.A., with high honors,B.B.A. in Business Administration and Software Engineering from the University of Louvain (Belgium), and a Master in Business Administration from INSEAD (France/Singapore).Iowa. Mr. TrempontPardun brings to the board broad executiveextensive management and financialoperations experience in the computer and telecommunications industries, including marketing and product development expertise, in accounting and financial reporting, throughas well as his service as Chief Executive Officer of Kanisa and Gemplus, as Chief Financial Officer of NeXT, his service on the boards of other publicly-held technology companies and his service on the audit committees of Energy Recovery, RealNetworks, Inc. and 3Com Corporation.in senior management positions.

        There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independence of Directors

        The board of directors has determined that, other than Jerry S. Rawls, our Chairman of the Board, and Eitan Gertel, our Chief Executive Officer, each of the current members of the board is an "independent director" for purposes of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the term applies to membership on the board of directors and the various committees of the board of directors.

Board of Directors Leadership Structure

        Jerry S. Rawls serves as Chairman of our board of directors, Eitan Gertel serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Messrs. Rawls and Gertel constitute our co-principal executive officers. The board believes that it is appropriate for Mr. Rawls to serve as Chairman given his long tenure with the Company and familiarity with our business strategy and our industry. The board also believes that having an executive officer serve as Chairman facilitates the flow of information between the board and management, thereby improving the board's ability to focus on key policy and operational issues and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In August 2008, on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the board established the position of Lead Director. Mr. Stephens currently serves in that position. The Lead Director serves as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman. In that capacity, the Lead Director presides over executive sessions of the independent directors, chairs board meetings in the Chairman's absence, and collaborates with the Chairman on agendas, schedules and materials for board meetings. The board believes that this leadership structure provides the appropriate balance of management and non-management oversight.

Table of Contents

Board of Directors' Role in Risk Oversight

        We face a number of risks, including general economic risks, operational risks, financial risks, competitive risks and reputational risks. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks that we face, while the board of directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management.

Table of Contents

        While the full board of directors is charged with ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, committees of the board also have responsibilities with respect to various aspects of our risk oversight. In particular, the Audit Committee plays a significant role in monitoring and assessing our financial and operational risks. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management areas of financial risk exposure and steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposure. The Audit Committee also is responsible for establishing and administering our code of ethics and reviewing and approving transactions between Finisar and any related parties. The Compensation Committee monitors and assesses risks associated with our compensation policies, and overseesconsults with management and the board regarding the development of incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking consistent with our overall strategy. The Nominating and Governance Committee has oversight responsibility for corporate governance risks, including risks associated with director independence.

        Our executive management meets regularly to discuss our strategy and the risks that we face. Senior officers attend board meetings where they are available to address questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management-related matters. In 2010, we instituted a comprehensive enterprise risk management ("ERM") program to assist management in identifying, assessing, monitoring and managing a broad range of risks. The ERM process is overseen by our Chief Financial Officer who periodically reports to the board on risk assessment and management's plans to manage or mitigate key risks. Our Internal Audit Department also plays an important role in risk management. Our Vice President of Internal Audit reports directly to the Audit Committee, has direct and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and regularly meets with the Audit Committee in executive session.

Executive Sessions

        Non-management directors generally meet in executive session without management present at each regularly scheduled meeting of the board. Mr. Stephens, in his capacity as Lead Director, presides at these executive sessions.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees

        The board of directors held ten meetings during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011. The board of directors has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The board of directors held seven meetings during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. During the last fiscal year, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the board and all of the committees of the board on which such director served during that period. The following table sets forth the standing committees of the board and the members of each committee as of the date this proxy statement was first made available to our stockholders.

Table of Contents

Audit Committee

        The members of the Audit Committee during fiscal 20112012 were Messrs. Child, (beginning in August 2010), Ferguson, Pardun Trempont and, until the annual meeting of stockholders in October 2010, Christopher J. Crespi,November 2011, Dominique Trempont, a former director who declined to stand for re-election. Messrs. Ferguson and TrempontPardun have been designated as audit committee financial experts, as defined in the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The functions of the Audit Committee include oversight, review and evaluation of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting processes, internal control functions and the audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm, and establishing and observing complaint procedures regarding accounting, internal auditing controls and auditing matters. Additional information concerning the Audit Committee is set forth in the Report of the Audit Committee immediately following Proposal No. 2. The Audit Committee held ten meetings during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee

        The members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 20112012 were Messrs. Child, (beginning in June 2010), Stephens Trempont and, until the annual meeting of stockholders in October 2010, David C. Fries,November 2011, Dominique Trempont, a former director who declined to stand for re-election. Mr. Pardun was appointed to serve on the Compensation Committee in June 2012. The Compensation Committee approves the compensation and benefits of our executive officers, reviews and approves equity awards to our employees and establishesconsults with management and reviews general policies relating tothe board regarding compensation and benefits ofprograms for our employees.executive officers. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee is set forth in "Executive Compensation and Related Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.

Nominating and Governance Committee

        The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee during fiscal 20112012 were Messrs. Ferguson, Pardun Stephens and until the annual meeting of stockholders in October 2010, David C. Fries, a former director who declined to stand for re-election.Stephens. The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies prospective candidates for appointment and nomination for election to the board of directors and makes recommendations to the board concerning such candidates, develops corporate governance principles for recommendation to the board of directors, makes recommendations to the board of directors regarding board and committee compensation and oversees the evaluation of our directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee held four meetings during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.

Director Nominations

        The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, the selection and recommendation to the board of directors of nominees for election as directors. When considering the nomination of directors for election at an annual meeting, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the needs of the board of directors for various skills, background, experience and expected contributions and the qualification standards established from time to time by the Nominating and Governance Committee. When reviewing potential nominees, including incumbents, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the perceived needs of the board of directors, the candidate's relevant background, experience and skills and expected contributions to the board of directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee also seeks appropriate input from the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in assessing the needs of the board of directors for relevant background, experience and skills of its members.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee's goal is to assemble a board of directors that brings to Finisar a diversity of experience at policy-making levels in business and technology, and in areas that are relevant to Finisar's global activities. Directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. They must have an inquisitive and objective outlook and mature judgment. They must also have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility and be leaders in the companies

Table of Contents

or institutions with which they are or have been affiliated. Director candidates must have sufficient time available in the judgment of the Nominating and Governance Committee to perform all board and committee responsibilities that will be expected of them. Members of the board of directors are expected to rigorously prepare for, attend and participate in all meetings of the board of directors and applicable committees. While we do not have a specific policy regarding diversity, when considering the nomination of directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider the diversity of its directors and nominees in terms of knowledge, experience, background, skills, expertise and other demographic factors. Other than the foregoing, there are no specific minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that it is preferable that a majority of the board of directors meet the definition of "independent director" set forth in Nasdaq and SEC rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee also believes it appropriate for one or

Table of Contents

more key members of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer, to serve on the board of directors.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates for directors proposed by directors or management, and will evaluate any such candidates against the criteria and pursuant to the policies and procedures set forth above. If the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the board of directors requires additional candidates for nomination, the Nominating and Governance Committee may engage, as appropriate, a third party search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. All incumbent directors and nominees will be required to submit a completed directors' and officers' questionnaire as part of the nominating process. The process may also include interviews and additional background and reference checks for non-incumbent nominees, at the discretion of the Nominating and Governance Committee.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider candidates for directors recommended by a stockholder, provided that any such recommendation is sent in writing to the board of directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 1389 Moffett Park Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94089-1113; Fax: (408) 745-6097; Email address: corporate.secretary@finisar.com, at least 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date definitive proxy materials were mailed to stockholders in connection with the prior year's annual meeting of stockholders and contains the following information:

•

the candidate's name, age, contact information and present principal occupation or employment; and



•

a description of the candidate's qualifications, skills, background and business experience during at least the last five years, including his or her principal occupation and employment and the name and principal business of any company or other organization where the candidate has been employed or has served as a director.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate any candidates recommended by stockholders against the same criteria and pursuant to the same policies and procedures applicable to the evaluation of candidates proposed by directors or management.

        In addition, stockholders may make direct nominations of directors for election at an annual meeting, provided the advance notice requirements set forth in our bylaws have been met. Under our bylaws, written notice of such nomination, including certain information and representations specified in the bylaws, must be delivered toreceived at our principal executive offices, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, at least 120 days prior toin advance of the anniversary of the date definitive proxy materials were mailedreleased to stockholders in connection with the priorprevious year's annual meeting of stockholders, except that if no annual meeting was held in the previous year, orif the date of the annual meeting has been advancedchanged by more than 30 days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year's proxy statement, or in the event of a special meeting, such notice must be received not later than the close of business on the 10thtenth day following the day on which the public announcementnotice of the date of suchthe meeting is firstwas mailed or public disclosure of the meeting date was made.

Table of Contents

Communications by Stockholders with Directors

        Stockholders may communicate with the board of directors, or any individual director, by transmitting correspondence by mail, facsimile or email, addressed as follows: Board of Directors or(or individual director,director), c/o Corporate Secretary, 1389 Moffett Park Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94089-1113; Fax: (408) 745-6097; Email Address: corporate.secretary@finisar.com. The Corporate Secretary will maintain a log of such communications and will transmit as soon as practicableforward such communications to the board of directors or to the identified director(s), although spam, junk mail, mass mailings, solicitations, advertisements and communications that are abusive, in bad taste or that present safety or security concerns may be handled differently, as determined by the Corporate Secretary.

Table of Contents

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

        We attempt to schedule our annual meeting of stockholders at a time and date to accommodate attendance by directors, taking into account the directors' schedules. Directors are encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders, but the board has not adopted a formal policy with respect to such attendance. ThreeAll of our directors, except for Mr. Trempont who was not standing for re-election, attended our last annual meeting of stockholders.

Committee Charters and Other Corporate Governance Materials

        We have a Code of Ethics, or the Code, that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. The Code is available athttp://investor.finisar.com/governance.cfm. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code or grant any waiver from a provision of the Code to any executive officer or director, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website, as well as via any other means then required by Nasdaq listing standards or applicable law.

        Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Each charter is available on our website athttp://investor.finisar.com/documents.cfm.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        None of the members of the Compensation Committee are or have been an officer or employee of Finisar. During fiscal 2011,2012, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with Finisar requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During fiscal 2011,2012, none of Finisar's executive officers served on the compensation committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity any of whose executive officers served on Finisar's Compensation Committee or board of directors.

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

        Under our current policy for the compensation of non-employee directors whichthat was in effect during fiscal 2011,2012, non-employee directors arewere entitled to receive an annual retainer of $50,000 that is payable quarterly.$50,000. The Lead Director receiveswas entitled to receive an additional amount of $10,000 per year for serving in that capacity. In addition, members of the standing committees of the board arewere entitled to receive annual retainers, payable quarterly, in the following amounts:

        We also reimburse directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board and its committees.

Table of Contents

        In addition, all new non-employee directors arewere entitled to receive a restricted stock unit ("RSU") award with a value of $100,000 upon their initial election to the board and an additional RSU award with a value of $50,000 on an annual basis thereafter. TheUnder the policy in effect during fiscal 2012, the grant of the annual RSU awards is generallywas made at the first meeting of the board in each fiscal year. The initial RSU awards vest over a period of three years from the date of grant, and the annual RSU awards vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The number of shares subject to each RSU award is determined based on the per share value of our common stock on the date of grant.

        The following table presents the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during or for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011:2012:

Director Compensation Table

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

        The Audit Committee of our board of directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of Finisar for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2012.2013. Ernst & Young LLP has acted in such capacity since its initial appointment in fiscal 1999. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the annual meeting, with the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

        The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to Finisar for the fiscal years ended April 30, 20112012 and April 30, 20102011 by Ernst & Young LLP:

        The Audit Committee has determined that all services performed by Ernst & Young LLP are compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax and other services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides for pre-approval by the Audit Committee of specifically defined audit and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been pre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to perform it. The Audit Committee has delegated to the chair of the Audit Committee the authority to approve permitted services, provided that the chair reports any decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval process.

Table of Contents

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required for approval of this proposal.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2012.2013.

Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

        The Audit Committee currently consists of fourthree directors, each of whom, in the judgment of the board of directors, is an "independent director" as defined in the listing standards for the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Audit Committee acts pursuant to a written charter that has been adopted by the board of directors. A copy of the charter is available on Finisar's website athttp://investor.finisar.com/documents.cfm.

        The Audit Committee oversees Finisar's financial reporting process on behalf of the board of directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for retaining Finisar's independent registered public accounting firm, evaluating its independence, qualifications and performance and approving in advance the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for all audit and non-audit services. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including internal control systems, and procedures designed to insure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Finisar's independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for expressing an opinion as to the conformity of our audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles.

        The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed Finisar's audited financial statements with management. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. In addition, the Audit Committee has met with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope of the independent registered public accounting firm's audit, the results of its examinations, its evaluations of Finisar's internal controls and the overall quality of Finisar's financial reporting.

        The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

        Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to Finisar's board of directors that Finisar's audited financial statements be included in Finisar's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.2012.

The foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Finisar under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Finisar specifically incorporates such information by reference.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 3

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ONTO APPROVE THE
COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Background

        The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, requires that our stockholders have the opportunity to vote to approve, oncast a non-binding or advisory basis, thevote on executive compensation, of our named executive officers as disclosed in the "Executive Compensation" section of this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules, commonly referred to as a "Say-on-Pay" vote. At our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on November 28, 2011, our stockholders voted in favor of holding future "Say-on-Pay" votes on an annual basis. Our board of directors subsequently determined that such advisory votes shall be held annually at the annual meeting of stockholders.

        As described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis included elsewhere in this proxy statement, we seek to closely align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to offer compensation that will enable us to attract and retain superior executive talent. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our executive officers for the achievement of our short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total stockholder return, while avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section starting on page 17 of this proxy statement for a more detailed discussion of our compensation philosophy and our executive compensation programs.

        ThisThe advisory vote on executive compensation solicited by this proposal is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Chairman of the Board, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers, who are collectively referred to as our named executive officers, which is disclosed elsewhere in this proxy statement. The vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on the Company, our board of directors or our Compensation Committee in any way.

        Furthermore, because this non-binding, advisory resolution primarily relates to the compensation of our named executive officers that has already been paid or contractually committed, there is generally no opportunity for us to revisit these decisions. However, our board of directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation policies and decisions.

        Stockholders will be asked at the annual meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 3:

        "RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion, is hereby approved.discussion."

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required for approval of this resolution.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" approval of the foregoing resolution.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 4

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY STOCKHOLDER VOTES
ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        The Dodd-Frank Act also requires that we conduct a separate advisory non-binding stockholder vote on whether future Say-on-Pay votes should occur every one, two or three years. You have the option to vote for any one of the three options, or to abstain from voting on the matter.

        Our board of directors believes that the Company's current executive compensation programs directly link executive compensation to our financial performance and align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Our board of directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation every year is the most appropriate option based on a number of considerations, including the following:

•

Annual votes will allow stockholders to provide the Company with their direct input on the compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year;



•

Annual votes are consistent with Company policies of annually seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, the Company's stockholders on corporate governance matters and executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices; and



•

Less frequent votes could allow an unpopular pay practice to continue too long without timely feedback.

        Stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the board's recommendation. Rather, stockholders are being provided with the opportunity to cast a non-binding, advisory vote on whether the stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers should occur once every (a) one year, (b) two years or (c) three years, or to abstain from voting on the matter.

        The vote on the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is advisory, and therefore is not binding on the Company, our board of directors or our Compensation Committee in any way. Our board of directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote in considering the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. If a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter do not vote in favor of one of the three frequencies, the frequency which receives the highest number of votes will be considered to be the frequency favored by stockholders.

The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote for the option of every "One Year" as the frequency with which the compensation of our named executive officers will be submitted for an advisory non-binding stockholder vote.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED MATTERS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

        The following discussion explains our compensation philosophy, objectives and procedures and describes the forms of compensation awarded to our Chairman of the Board, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and each of our three other most highly-compensated executives (determined as of April 30, 2011)2012). We refer to these individuals as our "named executive officers." This discussion focuses on the information contained in the tables and related footnotes and narrative included below, primarily for our 2011 fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, but also contains information regarding compensation actions taken before and after fiscal 20112012 to the extent we believe such information enhances our executive compensation disclosure.

Philosophy, Objectives and Procedures

        Our fundamental compensation philosophy is to align the compensation of our senior management with our annual and long-term business objectives and performance and to offer compensation that will enable us to attract, retain and appropriately reward executive officers whose contributions are necessary for our long-term success. We seek to reward our executive officers' contributions to achieving internal financial operating goals, revenue growth, increasing operating income growth and controlling costs.cost control. We operate in a very competitive environment for executive talent, and we believe that our compensation packages must be competitive when compared to our peers and should also be aligned with our stockholders' short and long-term interests.

        The Compensation Committee of our board of directors oversees the design and administration of our executive compensation program. The principal elements of the program are base salary, annual cash bonuses and equity-based incentives which, to date, have been in the form of stock options and restricted stock units, or RSUs. In general, the Compensation Committee's policy is that the total compensation paid to our executive officers should be fair and competitive, taking into account, among other factors, compensation paid by peer companies to officers with comparable responsibilities and our success in achieving our revenuefinancial and operating incomeoperational goals. However, it is not the Compensation Committee's policy to adhere to a rigid formula or benchmark system and, for a variety of reasons, including our comparatively rapid growth in recent growth,years, various elements of our executive compensation package may lag behind the median amounts paid by our peer companies.

        Generally, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of our executive officers in the early part of each fiscal year and takes action at that time to award cash bonuses for the preceding fiscal year, to set base salaries and target bonuses for the current fiscal year and to consider long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards. In setting our executive officers' total compensation, the Compensation Committee considers individual and company performance, as well as compensation surveys, including the Radford Executive Survey, and other market information regarding compensation paid by comparable companies, including our industry peers.

        In its annual review of compensation for our executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers compensation data and analyses assembled and prepared by our Human Resources staff. In reviewing the performance of our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee solicits input from the other non-employee members of the board of directors.directors and reviews performance assessments prepared by such officers. For the other executive officers, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer provide the Compensation Committee with a review of each individual's performance and contributions over the past year and make recommendations regarding their compensation that the Compensation Committee considers.

Table of Contents

        In some years, the Compensation Committee retains compensation consultants to assist it in its review of executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee engaged Assets

Table of Contents

Unlimited, Inc., a compensation consulting firm, in connection with its reviews at the beginning of fiscal 20112012 and fiscal 2012.2013. The Compensation Committee reviewed cash and equity compensation analyses prepared by Assets Unlimited, Inc. and met with a representative of that firm.

        At our 2011 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the meeting (commonly referred to as a "Say-on-Pay" vote). Our stockholders overwhelmingly approved the compensation of our named executive officers, with over 95% of the shares voted voting in favor of approving such compensation. As the stockholder advisory vote was held after the Compensation Committee had determined the compensation to be paid to our executive officers for fiscal 2012, the Compensation Committee did not take such results into account in determining executive compensation for fiscal 2012. However, in determining executive compensation for fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2011 stockholder Say-on-Pay vote, and the positive stockholder feedback that it represented, in the Committee's determination to continue our fundamental policies and procedures related to executive compensation and to adopt a compensation package for fiscal 2013 having a basic structure similar to compensation packages adopted for previous years.

Components of Compensation

        In order to align executive compensation with our compensation philosophy, our executive officer compensation package contains three primary elements: base salary, annual cash bonuses and long-term equity incentives. In addition, we provide to our executive officers a variety of benefits that are available generally to other salaried employees. The basic elements of our executive compensation package are generally the same among all of our named executive officers.

Fiscal 20112012 Base Salaries

        Base salaries for our executive officers are initially set based on negotiation with the individual executive officer at the time of his or her recruitment and with reference to salaries for comparable positions in the fiber optics industry for individuals of similar education and background to those of the executive officer being recruited. We also give consideration to the individual's experience, track record of contribution in his or her industry and expected contributions to Finisar. Salaries are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee, typically at the beginning of the fiscal year, and adjustments are made based on (i) salary recommendations of our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, (ii) the Compensation Committee's assessment of the individual performance of the executive officers during the previous fiscal year, (iii) Finisar's financial results for the previous fiscal year and the then-current outlook for the current fiscal year and (iv) changes in competitive pay levels, based on compensation data and analyses assembled and prepared by our Human RelationsResources staff and, in years when a compensation consultant is engaged to assist the Compensation Committee, reports by such consultant.

        The Compensation Committee engaged Assets Unlimited, Inc., a compensation consulting firm, to assist in its review of executive compensation for fiscal 2011.2012. Assets Unlimited, Inc. prepared a report

Table of Contents

including a summary of compensation data for the following companies, including our industry peers and similarly-sized companies in our broader industry group (the "Peer"Fiscal 2012 Peer Companies"):

        In considering executive compensation levels for fiscal 2011,2012, the Compensation Committee took into account its general compensation philosophy, as described above, and various other considerations, including the following:

•

the officers' salary history, including the fact that there had been no increases in base salaries during fiscal 2010 and an across-the-board salary reduction had been in effect during the first half of fiscal 2010;history;



•

specific contributions of individual officers during fiscal 2010, changes in their duties and responsibilities2011 and their expected contributions during fiscal 2011;2012;



•

the report of Assets Unlimited, Inc. on Peer Companypeer company compensation and other available compensation data for comparable companies, taking into account differences between the

actual responsibilities of the Finisar officers and those typical for the generic categories listed in the reports; and





•

Finisar'sthe Company's financial performance during fiscal 20102011 and the then-current outlook for fiscal 2011.2012.

        On the basis of its review, in June 2010,2011, the Compensation Committee set new base salaries for our executive officers for fiscal 2011,2012, with increases of between 4%3% and 5%12% over the levels in effect during fiscal 2009 and 2010 (excluding the period in fiscal 2010 during which the temporary salary reduction was in force).2011. The fiscal 20112012 base salaries of the named executive officers and data on base salaries of officers of comparable companies reviewed by the Compensation Committee in June 20102011 are as follows:

Table of Contents

Fiscal 20112012 Cash Bonuses

        Under our compensation policy, a substantial component of each executive officer's potential annual compensation takes the form of a performance-based cash bonus. The amounts of cash bonuses paid to our executive officers, other than the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, are determined by the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, based on Finisar's financial performance and the achievementspecific contributions of the officer's individual performance objectives.officers. The amount of cash bonuses paid to the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are determined by the Compensation Committee, without participation by the Chairman or the Chief Executive Officer, based on the same factors.

        In June 2010,2011, the Compensation Committee adopted an executive bonus plan for the fiscal year ended April 30, 20112012 (the "2011"2012 Plan"). Under the 20112012 Plan, the aggregate target bonuses for Messrs. Rawls and Gertel were 100% of their annual base salary, and the aggregate target bonus for each of the other named executive officers was 60% of their annual base salary. The aggregate bonus for each executive officer under the 20112012 Plan was to be based 70%50% on Finisar's achievement of the pre-bonus non-GAAP operating income called for by its fiscal 2011 operating plantargets and 30%50% on a discretionary determination by the Compensation Committee oftaking into account the Company's overall financial performance, the applicable executive officer's performance and achievement of individual goals for the fiscal year.year and such other factors as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. The maximum total bonus payable to each officer under the formula and discretionary components of the 2012 Plan was two times the officer's target bonus. Finisar was required to achieve at least 58%75.5% of its pre-bonus non-GAAP operating income target before a portion of the quantitative bonus would be earned; the amount of the bonus would increase on a linear basis thereafter, with no limit on the amount of the quantitative bonusfor operating income above that could be earned.amount. Our pre-bonus non-GAAP operating income during fiscal 2011 increased2012 was less than 75.5% of the target amount. Accordingly, no bonuses were earned by approximately 308% over the previous fiscal year and substantially exceeded our fiscal 2011 operating plan. Accordingly, bonuses earned byany of our executive officers under the quantitative component of the 20112012 Plan. However, in considering awards under the discretionary component of the 2012 Plan, substantially exceeded target levels. In lightthe Compensation Committee reviewed the overall performance of these results,Finisar and taking

Tableits executive management team during fiscal 2012. The Compensation Committee considered recommendations made by the Chairman of Contents

the Board and the Chief Executive Officer and, with respect to those officers, considered a written performance evaluation prepared by them as well as input from the other non-employee directors. Among other things, the Compensation Committee considered Finisar's financial performance compared to its peers, challenges that it faced in the markets that it serves, execution of Finisar's strategy, including the acquisition and integration of Ignis ASA, research and development initiatives undertaken to support entry into account our operating results fornew markets, and expansion of its operations in China, as well as management's record of employee retention. Based on its assessment of management's overall performance in a challenging market environment, and the fourth quarterindividual performance of fiscal 2011,the executive officers, the Compensation Committee determined that no portion80% of the discretionary component of the 20112012 Plan (or 40% of the total target bonus) would be awarded.awarded to each executive officer. Original target bonuses for each of the named executive officers under the 20112012 Plan, cash bonuses actually awarded and paid under the plan for their services during fiscal 20112012 and data on bonuses and non-equity compensation paid by comparable

Table of Contents

companies reviewed by the Compensation Committee in June 20102011, when the 2012 Plan was adopted, are as follows:

Equity-based Incentives

        Longer term incentives are provided through equity-based awards granted under Finisar's 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which reward executives and other employees through the growth in value of our stock. To date, these awards have been in the form of stock options and RSUs.RSUs, the ultimate value of which is determined by the long-term performance of our stock. The Compensation Committee believes that employee equity ownership is highly motivating, provides an important incentive for employees to build stockholder value and provides each executive officer with a significant incentive to manage Finisar from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the company.

        All stock option awards to our employees, including executive officers, are granted at fair market value on the date of grant, and will provide value to the executive officers only when the price of our common stock increases over the exercise price. We have established a policy whereby stock options and other equity awards to our employees, including executive officers, are generally granted by the Compensation Committee at regular quarterly meetings with an effective date that is the later of the third trading day following the public announcement of Finisar's financial results for the preceding quarter or the date of the meeting at which the grant is approved.

        The vesting of stock options and RSUs held by our named executive officers is subject to acceleration pursuant to the terms of the Finisar Executive Retention and Severance Plan described belowbelow.

        The grant of equity-based awards is generally considered by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis in the early part of each fiscal year, at the same time as other components of executive compensation are reviewed and with respectannual equity-based awards are granted to one stock option held by each of Eitan Gertel, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Colyar, our Senior Vice President, Operations and Engineering, pursuant to the applicable stock option agreement as described below.

Table of Contents

non-officer employees. The size of the stock option and RSUequity-based awards granted to each executive officer during fiscal 2011 wasare set by the Compensation Committee at levels that wereare intended to create a meaningful opportunity for stock ownership based upon the individual's current position, the individual's personal performance in recent periods, the individual's potential for future responsibility and promotion, over the option term, comparison of award levels in prior years and comparison of award levels earned by executives at our peer companies and similarly-sized companies in our broader industry group. The Compensation Committee also tooktakes into account the

Table of Contents

number of unvested options and RSUs held by the executive officer in order to maintain an appropriate level of retention value for that individual. The relative weight given

        In connection with its annual review of executive officer compensation in June 2011, the Compensation Committee awarded annual grants of RSUs to each of these factors varies from individual to individual.

        In fiscal 2011, our executive officers received an annual grant of RSUs in June 2010 based onfor fiscal 2012. In granting the awards, the Compensation Committee considered the various factors described above, withincluding input from its compensation consultant, Assets Unlimited, Inc., regarding the relative weight givenequity-based compensation of executive officers of comparable companies. The RSUs awarded to each of these factors varying from individual to individual. The RSUsthe executive officers vest in annual installments over a four-year period, subject to the officers'officer's continued service. The numbersnumber of shares of our common stock underlying the RSUs granted to the named executive officers were as follows:

Other Benefits and Perquisites

        Our named executive officers and other executives are generally eligible to receive the same health and welfare benefits offered to all employees in the geographic area in which they are based. WeThey are also offer participationeligible to participate in our defined contribution 401(k) plan.plan on the same basis as our other employees. We currently provide no other perquisites to our named executive officers or other executive officers.

        During fiscal 2011,2012, personal benefits accounted for less than 2% of the total compensation of our Chairman, our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers.

Changes in Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2012;2013; Fiscal 20122013 Executive Bonus Plan

        For fiscal 2012,2013, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee again engaged Assets Unlimited, Inc. to assist in its review. Assets Unlimited, Inc. prepared a report including a summary of compensation data for the following companies, including our industry peers and similarly-sized companies in our broader industry group:group (the "Fiscal 2013 Peer Companies"):

Table of Contents

        In consideringits annual review of executive compensation levels for fiscal 20122013 the Compensation Committee took into account its general compensation philosophy, as described above, and various other considerations, including the following:

•

the officers' salary history;



•

specific contributions of individual officers during fiscal 20112012 and their expected contributions during fiscal 2012;2013;



•

the report of Assets Unlimited, Inc. on peer company compensation and other available compensation data for comparable companies, taking into account differences between the actual responsibilities of the Finisar officers and those typical for the generic categories listed in the reports; and



•

Finisar's financial performance during fiscal 20112012 and the then-current outlook for fiscal 2012.2013.

        OnThe Compensation Committee noted that, on the basis of Finisar's recent financial performance and its review,near-term outlook, annual salary increases for non-officer personnel, typically awarded in the first fiscal quarter, had been deferred. Accordingly, in June 2011,2012, the Compensation Committee set newdetermined not to increase the base salaries forof our executive officers forfrom their fiscal 2012 with increases of between 3% and 12% over the levels in effect during fiscal 2011.levels. The fiscal 20122013 base salaries of the named executive officers and data on base salaries of officers of comparable companies reviewed by the Compensation Committee in June 20112012 are as follows:

        In June 2011,2012, the Compensation Committee also adopted an executive bonus plan for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013 (the "2013 Plan"), which is similar in structure to previous executive bonus plans, including the 2012 (the "2012 Plan").Plan. Under the 20122013 Plan, the aggregate target bonuses for Messrs. Rawls and Gertel are 100% of their annual base salary, and the aggregate target bonus for each of the other named executive officers is 60% of their annual base salary. The aggregate bonus for each executive officer under the 20122013 Plan will be based 50% on Finisar's achievement of pre-bonus non-GAAP operating income targets and 50% on a discretionary determination by the Compensation Committee taking into account the Company'sFinisar's overall financial performance, the applicable executive officer's performance for the fiscal year and such other factors as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. The maximum total bonus payable to each officer under the formula and discretionary components of the 20122013 Plan is two times the officer's target bonus. Any bonus amounts earned under the 20122013 Plan are expected to be paid in cash. The Compensation Committee believes that achieving the formula-based portion of the target bonuses will be difficult. Achieving or exceeding the pre-bonus non-GAAP operating income targets will be dependent upon realizing revenue and operating income growth in the face ofovercoming operational challenges andin an environment of continuing economic uncertainty. It will also be dependent on increased sales of our

Table of Contents

customers' products over which we have no control. Finisar has

Table of Contents

achieved or exceeded the non-GAAP operating income called for in its original annual operating plan in two of its last five fiscal years.

        In connection with its review of executive officer compensation in June 2011,2012, the Compensation Committee also grantedawarded annual grants of RSUs to each of our executive officers.officers for fiscal 2013. The RSUs vest in annual installments over a four-year period, subject to the officers' continued service. In granting the awards, the Compensation Committee considered the factors described above under the heading "Equity-based Incentives," including input from its compensation consultant, Assets Unlimited, Inc., regarding the equity-based compensation of executive officers of comparable companies. The number of shares of our common stock underlying the RSUs granted to the named executive officers were calculated by dividing the following dollar values by the greater of (i) the closing sale price of our common stock on the date of grant and (ii) $15.00, with such amount rounded to the nearest whole share:as follows:

Executive Retention and Severance Plan

        Our executive officers and certain other key executives designated by the Compensation Committee are eligible to participate in the Finisar Executive Retention and Severance Plan adopted by the Compensation Committee in February 2003. The Compensation Committee determined to provide change in control arrangements in order to mitigate some of the risk that exists for executives working in an environment where there is a meaningful possibility that Finisar could be acquired or the subject of another transaction that would result in a change in its control. Finisar's change in control and severance arrangements are intended to attract and retain qualified executives who may have attractive alternatives absent these arrangements. The change in control arrangements are also intended to mitigate potential disincentives to the consideration and execution of an acquisition or similar transaction, particularly where the services of these executive officers may not be required by the acquirer. We believe that our change in control benefits are comparable to the provisions and benefit levels of other companies in our industry which disclose similar plans in their public filings.

        Participants in this plan who are executive officers are entitled to receive cash severance payments equal to two years base salary and health and medical benefits for two years in the event their employment is terminatedof a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control of Finisar. A qualifying termination is defined as an involuntary termination other than for cause or a voluntary termination for good reason upon or within 18 months following a change in control, as such terms are defined in the plan. In addition, in the event of a change in control, vesting of stock options held by participants in the plan will be accelerated by one year, if the options are assumed by the acquiring company. If the options are not assumed by the acquirer, or if theupon a participant's employment is terminatedqualifying termination in connection with the change in control, vesting of the options will be accelerated in full. The plan also provides that the vesting of RSUs held by participants in the plan will be accelerated in full upon a qualifying termination. Upon any other termination of employment, participants are entitled only to accrued salary and any other vested benefits through the date of termination.

        Our executive officersChief Executive Officer, who werewas a former officersofficer of Optium, are partiesis a party to an employment agreementsagreement and equity incentive agreementsagreement that theyhe entered into with Optium and that were assumed by Finisar in connection with the Optium merger. See "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" below. Benefits to these officersthis officer under the Executive Retention and Severance Plan will be reduced by the amount of comparable benefits to which they arehe is entitled under such agreements.

Table of Contents

Accounting for Executive Compensation

        We account for equity compensation paid to our employees under the rules of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 "Compensation—Stock Compensation", which require us to

Table of Contents

measure and record an expense over the service period of the award. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is incurred.

Tax Considerations

        The Compensation Committee intends to consider the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in determining the mix of elements of future executive compensation. This section limits the deductibility of non-performance based compensation paid to each of Finisar's named executive officers to $1 million annually. The equity awards granted to our executive officers are intended to be treated as performance-based compensation, which is exempt from the limitation on deductibility under current federal tax law. The Compensation Committee reserves the right to provide for compensation to executive officers that may not be fully deductible.

Report of the Compensation Committee

        We have reviewed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed it with management. Based on such review and discussions, we have recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this annual report.proxy statement.

Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Information

        The following table presents certain summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by us for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 forby (i) our Chairman of the Board, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, and (ii) our three other most highly compensated executivesexecutive officers (determined as of April 30, 2011)2012) (collectively, the "named executive officers"):

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 20112012

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

        The following table sets forth certain information with respect to options and RSUs granted during or for the fiscal year ended April 30, 20112012 to each of our named executive officers.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in or for Fiscal 20112012

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

        The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying outstanding equity awards for each of our named executive officers as of the end of our fiscal year on April 30, 2011.2012. Unless otherwise specified, options vest at a rate of 20% over five years from the date of grant. Market value for RSUs is determined by multiplying the number of shares by the closing price of Finisar common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the last trading day of the fiscal year ($28.0916.52 on April 29, 2011)30, 2012).

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20112012